Survive 2012 by Robert Bast - Special Offer at Amazon - Click Here!
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »

From DIY to Russian megabunkers


Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary


Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat


More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Uncategorized

DNA Evidence of Bigfoot?

Submitted by on February 19, 2013 – 2:57 amOne Comment

I think that there might really be Yeti in the Himalayas, and there’s a lesser chance that Bigfoot is also real, in North America. So I was really excited to read the following at Red Orbit:

A team of scientists has published the results of a five-year study of DNA samples from Sasquatch in the journal DeNovo Journal of Science.

Researchers claim they have sequenced three whole Bigfoot nuclear genomes, helping to prove that the legendary creature exists in North America, and is a human relative that arose 13,000 years ago.

The scientists hypothesize that the Bigfoot creature is a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens, with a novel primate species, giving it the species name Homo sapiens cognatus.

And it sounds legit, with the study appearing in a scientific journal, and information like this:

“Clearly non-human hair (morphologically), washed thoroughly as is accepted procedure in forensic science to remove contaminates by two laboratories with two techniques, yielded human mitochondrial DNA sequence in all 111 samples in the study,” she said. “Thirty samples were taken past the screening to yield human mitochondrial haplotypes with twenty of those being entire mitochondrial genomes 16,500 bases long. Since species identification depends on the mitochondrial DNA in forensics, this clearly placed the samples in the family Homo, ie hominin. Screening by sequencing with universal primers would have also shown contamination if it had been there.”

So the hair is non-human looking, but has some human DNA….

This would be a massive story (and therefore would perhaps be in your daily newspaper or TV news) if it were true. Sadly there is plenty of evidence that this is not the proof many had hoped for.  According to the website of the “journal”, their current issue is Volume 1, Issue 1, and the Bigfoot story is the only work mentioned. The website is new this year, and there is nothing anywhere about who runs it, let alone who the editors of the journal are. So, the journal has been created solely to add credence to the study. That is massively suspicious…

One Comment »

  • Steven says:

    You need to dig a bit deeper, Rob, Ive been following this team of scientists and their research for months, dont let the new journal put you off, its just the mainstream science journals, as always, keen to avoid sticking their necks out even a little.
    Check out the full backstory on a blog called ‘Phantoms and Monsters’, a well respected website run by Lon Stickler, you may be surprised…

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.