Survive 2012 by Robert Bast - Special Offer at Amazon - Click Here!
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »
Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Authors, Safe Spots

Shifting To Our Safe Spot – For Good

Submitted by on December 23, 2012 – 8:52 pm3 Comments

As if the End Of The World (and associated hullabaloo) wasn’t stressful enough, we are moving out of the city, to spend a couple of years (at least) at our safe spot. Just a few days from now. Yep, while juggling media appearances I was packing boxes. I wonder how this past week would rate on a stress meter?

The timing is more to do with school years and family visits than the doomsday we just dodged – in case you were wondering why we would move after Dec 21 and not before. Plus, the house was only officially finished a few days ago. Oh yeah, I’ve been dealing with banks and builders as well.

So I won’t be posting much in the next week. But then I’ll get cracking on the backlog of things I figure are 2012-relevant but I have yet to write about.

As I have been saying, I consider the six months either side of Dec 21 as the risk period, so I’ll carry on with the presumption that we still could be confronted with a cataclysm at any time. This isn’t some sort of Harold Camping make-up-a-new-date bullshit, but a combo of me thinking Dec 21 might have been symbolic (the darkest day) combined with just being a standard prepper, ready for anything.

3 Comments »

  • Isaac says:

    I respect you, your work, and you have my full moral support… Stay strong!

  • 2012portal says:

    Good choice, for many reasons. Firstly, it is a better life then a busy, polluted city. Secondly, December 21, 2012 was a marker. What happens after that point is more the concern then the date and 11:11 in and of itself. Have fun, stay safe, ENJOY!

  • Robert Bast says:

    BTW, I am very slowly growing to love the standard/defauly Australian bush scenery. So many people live in fire-risk zones just to immerse themselves into this that I figured there was something to it, but until this week (literally) I never got it.

    So the view from our balcony is f’in awesome!

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.