Survive 2012 by Robert Bast - Special Offer at Amazon - Click Here!
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »

From DIY to Russian megabunkers


Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary


Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat


More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Conspiracy

Pineal Gland and Fluoride

Submitted by on November 14, 2012 – 8:25 pmNo Comment

I read a lot of alternative news items, books etc. The vast majority of it fails to pass my BS-detector. But some do – which is good because I am skeptic who wants to believe. And when it comes to fluoride in our water, I think perhaps it could be for reasons other than protecting our teeth from decay.

First off, verifiable science, from an article at

Following the initial breakthroughs on the link between fluoride and pineal gland calcification, scientists began to examine the issue more closely. In 2006, the National Research Council (NRC) released its report: “Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards.”

The NRC began working on the report in 2003 as requested by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in order to review the latest research on fluoride toxicity and assess the EPA’s current safe drinking water standards for fluoride. In 2006, the report was released with a summary that backed up the work of Dr. Luke and her research team who conducted the first experiment on the role fluoride plays in pineal gland calcification back in 1997. The summary was printed in the National Academies Press, Washington D.C. P221-22:

“The single animal study of pineal function indicates that fluoride exposure results in altered melatonin production and altered timing of sexual maturity… Recent information on the role of the pineal organ in humans suggests that any agent that affects pineal function could affect human health in a variety of ways, including effects on sexual maturation, calcium metabolism, parathyroid function, postmenopausal osteoporosis, cancer, and psychiatric disease.”

You can also find the above quote at National Academies Press and Google Books. And extra studies on pineal gland calcification.

That’s a good start – the NRC says that an animal study should have humans worried about how fluoride might affect their pineal gland. Combine that with numerous other studies referenced at Fluoride Action Network, and it seems clear that water fluoridation is at least misguided. But could there be a more sinister angle?

Quite possibly the largest pine cone statue in the world is at the Vatican (above). The pineal gland is named after the pine cone, because of its physical resemblance. See some ancient images of pine cone symbolism. The association has been around for a very long time, and if there is an Illuminati they would definitely be aware of it, and probably believe in the pineal gland being our 3rd eye.

I don’t subscribe to the notion of a NWO wishing to reduce population numbers – it makes poor economic sense. But there is a strong case for them wanting apathetic subjects. So, here’s the thought pattern as a starting point for your own research:

  • Governments feed us fluoride (via water) even though it is harmful and probably not much use for our teeth
  • Any government, but especially Illuminati/NWO, would love to be able to pacify their subjects
  • Distribution via tap water would be the simplest and most comprehensive means of delivering a pacifying drug

Hold on! Could Fluoride pacify people?

Prozac may represent an archetypal example of how fluoride affects the personality/soul. This drug (chemical name fluoxetine) is approximately 30% fluoride by weight and marketed as an “antidepressant,” even while a major side effect of its use and/or withdrawal is suicidal depression. [Source]

Chemical compounds that sound the same, and share ingredients, aren’t necessarily like each other at all – you wouldn’t say that air and water are the same thing. Or petrol and plastic.

There’s a lot online that discusses Nazi use of fluoride in concentration camps. The best discussion of this I have found is here, excerpt follows:

Did the Nazis use water fluoridation in their concentration camps for the purpose of “mass medication”? While searching for information about this, the name Charles E Perkins shows up. Perkins was supposedly a chemist and/or researcher who wrote the book, “The Truth about Water Fluoridation”. Information supposedly supplied by Perkins is pretty much the sole authority of the Nazis use of fluoridation. Another story is Perkins was supposedly in contact with the German chemists of I.G. Farben after the war and was told of the “scheme (to) control the population in any given area through mass medication of (fluoridated) drinking water.” further “Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotising a certain area of the brain, and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him”.

So, it all comes down to whether you trust someone who was anti-fluoridation, who wrote in the 50s that the Nazis did this, without providing any proof. But then again, we have this from Einstein`s nephew, Dr. E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a prisoner of war during WWII) in a letter printed in The Catholic Mirror, Springfield, MA, January 1952:

“It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the `next` on the agenda of the water poisoners…

“Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration. …

“As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22 years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on my years of practical experience in the health-food and chemical field, let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national suicide. Don`t do it. [Source]

What does this have to do with 2012? Well, if you live a survivalist lifestyle – one that does not rely on tap water – you might find you have a heightened awareness of various risks in society and nature, compared to city folk… Might, maybe, possibly. No harm in trying.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.