Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »
Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Events

Pythagoras Conference Update

Submitted by on October 10, 2012 – 8:31 amNo Comment

Organizer Sandra D. Sabatini has put out a press release, that is quite long-winded and is full of conspiracy reasons for why the conference has been cancelled at the last minute. She says:

  • as if invisible minds and hands had declared our conference unworthy, even dangerous to the public
  • This is not intended, directly or indirectly, as an indictment of official government for a suppression we are now learning is being carried out by officially connected rogue but emotionally disconnected individuals from the sum total of all of us – not just in this country.We are also now learning through the grapevine in the USA that those executing this operation are yet unidentified former intelligence and military officers.
  • suppression of the freedom of speech of specific individual presenters at the conference
  • a well-planned and intelligently executed campaign laid out most likely months in advance

Near the end of the press release is what actually occurred:

Why would the venue itself breach its own agreement with our company by demanding complete prepayment instead of the agreed net-30 payment scheduled and agreed well in advance? This was in fact the death knell to the conference itself. Coming up with a sum nearly six-figures large on such short notice was near impossible, and it was.

Given that attendees have to pay up front, the only way this is plausible is that they expected a lot of additional revenue from selling merchandise and last-minute subscriptions to online viewing.

My best guess, reading between the lines, is that the venue owners heard that ticket sales were low – too low to cover the venue hire. And I would expect there was something in the contract that enabled them to ask for the fee upfront, otherwise Sabatini would presumably be suing them.

My big question is this – how many presenters were already en-route to the conference when it was cancelled?

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.