Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »
Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Evolution, UFOs

First Man-Made Species

Submitted by on August 8, 2012 – 6:01 pm5 Comments

This would be of special interest to those who believe that humans are a hybrid species created by aliens (not me…).

Moreno genetically modified the fruit flyDrosophila melanogaster so that this new species Drosophila synthetica cannot reproduce with the naturally occurring species of fruit fly. Drosophila synthetica also has smaller, lighter eyes and the wing veins have a different structure than the natural species.
http://www.examiner.com/article/first-man-made-species-revealed

Hybrid animals can be created through natural breeding, but this is the first time an entirely new species has been created by man – with the definition of species meaning it can only reproduce with its own. And it is potentially good news, because whichever traits are bio-engineered will (hopefully) be impossible to transfer to the originating species.

Where could this lead?

Presumably we will see new species of livestock – I reckon chickens will be first. But in the long term you’s expect that someone, somewhere, will try to improve humans. I don’t like the idea one bit, but would it be unethical?

5 Comments »

  • Watson says:

    Hey, been a follower of your blog but this is really the first time i comment ==

    anyhow, bout this creating of whole new species, you pointed that “Where could this lead?”

    well i’m not too sure how gaming are you, but in games. especially those originated from Japan, have this whole new species of humans, named Bioroids. Yes, genetically modified, with far more superiors traits than the original humans; let’s just say they are not really friendly after the modification since most are modified to be less emotional (yeah yeah those weaklings emotional stuffs that movies always said).

    well, perhaps that’s one of the futures eh?

  • ladyd904 says:

    This makes me incredibly angry. just because we CAN do a thing, does not mean we should. look at what happened when they introduced that asian fish into the river, (can’t remember where) now when you drive your boat on the river the darn things are jumping into the boat and even injuring people. they will not get rid of this mess anytime soon. WE NEED TO THINK BEFORE WE JUMP. I learned that one as a child.

  • Robert Bast says:

    Welcome Watson,

    Therein lies the problem. Scientists find it hard to restrain themselves – we’d possibly have cloned humans if it was legal. And the idea of a super-human is so exciting… Frankenstein’s Monster was written a long time ago – evidence that the desire is certainly there.

  • Watson says:

    Robert & Ladyd904:

    As Robert said, “Scientists find it hard to restrain themselves” yeah, i have to admit being a scientist really has some problems whenever dealing with knowledge vs ethics. Frequently, we find ourselves struggling with should or should not. and there is forever not a concrete answer. Just like the case of human cloning, the possible future from it is just so overwhelming that sometimes i would actually imagine what will happen if it is a go?

  • Kartik says:

    Ethics is really a recent addition to science , lot of stuff as been done which was unethical and un human (by today’s standard), but this is the way science will progress. Just imagine introduction of a new drug , it has to be tested on humans (and animals which is also unethical in some way) there is no other way (Here I imply that persons should know that they are under test). Cloning of humans I somehow feel that it is already being done somewhere secretly.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.