Survive 2012 by Robert Bast - Special Offer at Amazon - Click Here!
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »
Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Nuclear

Fukushima Radiation in the USA – Really?

Submitted by on April 27, 2012 – 11:47 pm3 Comments

Just in case you were falling for the radiation scaremongering… you might have noticed that the mainstream media have not reported on this, and I can’t see how you could suggest it is a “conspiracy”. Reality… it’s a non-story, despite what you may read:

I figure if I looked in my garden I could find some mutated-looking plants. My years of fruit-picking (I grew up on an orchard) has me certain that odd-looking plants are not unusual. So, besides the pics of “mutated plants”, I haven’t seen any real evidence that Fukushima has affected anyone outside of the local zone.

Here’s a common sense look at the non-problem:

….in Iran, the natural radiation gives people a dose of up to 260mSv a year. They have been living there for thousands of years. No ill health effects have ever been seen.

A year after the Fukushima accident, radiation experts show that most members of the public in the affected zone received doses of less than 1mSv, which is trivial. The worst dose, to only two people, was not more than 23mSv.

The ensuing nuclear accident at Fukushima killed nobody. Lacking any casualties, the activists use the fear of radiation. [According to Wikipedia, as of September 2011, there were no deaths or serious injuries due to direct radiation exposures.]

3 Comments »

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.