Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »
Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Supernova

NASA: No Supernova in 2012

Submitted by on December 18, 2011 – 9:19 amNo Comment

Before we get to the debunk itself, here’s a couple of thoughts:

LAZY: The first 3 pages on Google for 2012 supernova find a straight-to-video mockbuster movie of the same name, and a website called 2012supernova.org that doesn’t actually mention supernovas. And that’s it. They are debunking something that didn’t need debunking because nobody believes it.

Of course now there’s a web page about it written by NASA…

NO DISCLAIMER: Every time scientists tell us about space, they should really put a disclaimer at the bottom, saying: We are constantly learning about outer space, every year we find many things that we didn’t expect, and everything we tell you could be proven to be wrong if new data arrives.

The NASA debunk itself is pretty standard:

Yes – supernovae and gamma-ray bursts could fry us.
No – there’s no stars or black holes close enough to harm us, and anyway they won’t happen soon.

Given the incredible amounts of energy in a supernova explosion – as much as the sun creates during its entire lifetime – another erroneous doomsday theory is that such an explosion could happen in 2012 and harm life on Earth. However, given the vastness of space and the long times between supernovae, astronomers can say with certainty that there is no threatening star close enough to hurt Earth.
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012-supernova.html

The problem is that they lie by omission. Determining if something from space can harm us requires an equation. I have no idea how to formulate a scientific equation for supernovae and GMBs, but I do know that an equation has more than one part. So in layman’s terms it would go like this:

Force / Distance = Harm

If our Sun goes supernova, we are dead. If a star 1 billion light years away that is the size of our Sun goes supernova, we are safe. That’s distance.

But the other variable is force. The size of a star might not be the only indicator, and there’s might be different types of supernova – imagine a supernova jet! This is from Space.com:

Astronomers have previously said that any supernova explosion within 100 light-years of Earth would likely be devastating, but beyond 100 light-years, it’s not known for sure what the effects might be. However, astronomers have also been keeping an eye on Eta Carinae, a potential supernova about 7,500 light-years away. One factor, astronomers say, is how powerful a given supernova is.

The debunk was written by a senior staff writer, so there’s no excuse for ignoring recent science news on the topic:

Jan 2011: Gamma Rays have been detected from a nova (not to be confused with a supernova) for the first time, something that has surprised scientists.
March 2010: T Pyxidis, 3260 light years away, could go supernova at any time.
Feb 2010: A GRB from Wr 104 could harm us.
April 2009: Stefan Immler of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center suggests that Eta Carinae could explode in our lifetime or even in the next few years.
Feb 2009: A flash in space that lasted 200 days puzzles scientists. One suggestion is that it is a new type of supernova.
April 2008: Supernova SN 2006gy was 100x brighter than usual.

And just a few days ago I reported on the super-massive black holes that have been discovered…

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.