NASA: Global Warming Model Wrong
It is a fact that the average global temperature has not risen in the last decade. This highlights the difference between computer models and actual measurement and observation. Because the computer models vary greatly, we get figures of between a 1 and 6 degree Celsius rise by 2100. And yet temperature isn’t rising, which means the models are wrong. This week two faults were highlighted, and it makes me wonder how believable the models are, or did they just tweak the numbers until they had figures that pleased the Powers-That-Be?
Data from NASA’s Terra satellite suggests that when the climate warms, Earth’s atmosphere is apparently more efficient at releasing energy to space than models used to forecast climate change may indicate.
The result is climate forecasts that are warming substantially faster than the atmosphere, says Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist in the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville. The previously unexplained differences between model-based forecasts of rapid global warming and meteorological data showing a slower rate of warming have been the source of often contentious debate and controversy for more than two decades.
In research published this week in the journal Remote Sensing, Spencer and UA Huntsville’s Dr. Danny Braswell compared what a half dozen climate models say the atmosphere should do to satellite data showing what the atmosphere actually did during the 18 months before and after warming events between 2000 and 2011.
“The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Spencer said. “There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”
Meanwhile another reason has arrived, bringing a possible solution to global warming that no sane politician would dare to suggest – encourage China to pollute their skies!
The huge increase in coal-fired power stations in China has masked the impact of global warming in the last decade because of the cooling effect of their sulphur emissions…
Yep, although the computer models managed to count CO2 emissions from Chinese power stations, they seemingly ignored sulphur emissions – so which other factors have they got wrong if they missed such an easy one?
Capping off a bad week for climate change scientists, one of their number has been accused of misconduct. “Charles Monnett was one of the scientists whose observation that several polar bears had drowned in the Arctic Ocean helped galvanize the global warming movement”, and this is the study that Al Gore misrepresented, by saying it was ice melting that was killing polar bears, rather than a storm. Seems like Mr Monnett is the fall guy, to protect Mr Gore.
In case you are wondering, many 2012ers do believe that man-made climate change will be our downfall, so I like to present my (opposite) view.
Real science uses observation and measurement. And the planet is not currently getting any warmer. Try telling that to the Climatic Research Unit. You’d think this UK think tank could provide the raw data on global temperatures, but the best you’ll find in their entire site (correct me if I’m wrong…) is this distorted graph that gives the wrong picture to curious citizens:
If they were to show previous centuries, it wouldn’t look alarming at all.
Meanwhile in Australia, popular newspaper columnists Terry McCran and Andrew Bolt have been pointing out problems with the new Carbon Tax of the Gillard government:
- It is named Carbon Tax, a tax on carbon pollution. This is a deliberate ploy to confuse people into thinking it is black soot that is being taxed. To the contrary it is CO2, which is not listed as a pollutant, and as we were taught in high school, is what we breathe out and plants breathe in. Naming it correctly would let people realise that it is not pollution being taxed, but a gas that is an integral part of Gaia.
- Chief Climate Commissioner Tim Flannery lives by the sea, despite warning in 2006 of sea rises of 15+ meters
- Prof Peter Ridd (James Cook University) says skeptics should also be funded
- An Australian coastal researcher has shown that sea level rises are reducing
- Tony Blair is being paid at least £700K per year advising an American company on climate change, just as David Cameron sides with Julia Gillard
In 1974, Time Magazine’s lead article was about the coming ice age: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944914,00.html
I was a science major at the time, and the environmental departments received massive government grants to fund ice age research. Science is interesting. It is 100% accurate until disproved.
Global Warming is the biggest lie…
Pls watch this documentary from ARTE,it´s in german but it presents the reality found out by a danish scientist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTtDgPrMwo8
It´s called THE SECRET OF THE CLOUDS and talks about increased solar activity and global warming theory which is wrong! See it!
2012 Survival
Will the World End in 2012?
I recently was told about a movie called
“The Quickening” you can Google this search term and it will be displayed as
The Quickening On Vimeo.
This theory is about events beginning in 2011 as opposed to 2012.
Hopefully we can create our own reality by not accepting anything else!
All The Best
2012