Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »

Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Video

100 Days of Disaster – VIDEO UPDATE

Submitted by Robert Bast on April 20, 2011 – 12:59 amOne Comment

I’ve got no idea if this will be on YouTube for a day, a week, or forever, but here’s the documentary for non-Aussies to see:

100 Days of Disaster

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6a_shq3xCKI

The other parts can be found easily on YouTube if you search there for 100 Days of Disaster.

My understanding is that it had 335,000 viewers which is average for 10PM on a Monday. I’m particularly happy with the overall 2012 angle that was presented. Patrick Geryl did well, and between us I feel that the 2012 doomsday scenario was given a good airing. Certainly the bit where I say NASA isn’t giving us the full story and the NASA debunker seemed insane (relative to myself) was pleasing. While I doubt Channel Ten will be doing anything more with this, I believe Discovery/History/NatGeo would love to screen it.

I screwed up a little… I said that in June there are two lunar eclipses and one solar eclipse. It’s the other way around. And the general location of my bunker was given away, but that’s OK – it’s not like an address or anything, and from recent emails I know I have already inspired some folk to be more proactive about surviving 2012.

One Comment »

Steven M. Guttman says:

August 31, 2012 at 12:28 am

I suppose that is why I find Rob to be so creditable.Because the
only thing I have seen him make a small amount of money on,is his
book on survival,which could be used in asssociation with DOOMSDAY,
or any type of emergency situation. The idea is to be prepared.
I do not believe that FEMA blew off a more thorough rescue of people
in New Orleans because they were predominantly Black and poor,I think
they would have blown off white and poor with equal apathy.Rob’s
book shows what you will need to survive in an emergency situation,
from NIBIRU,(LOL) to tornados,floods,hurricanes and anything else
that may cause the power grid to shut down, Good Job Rob!