Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »
Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Safe Spots, Survivalism

Staying Put

Submitted by on October 11, 2012 – 1:29 amNo Comment

I love the thoroughness of Holly Deyo. Her Dare To Prepare book is a must have, and I think the dry, functional attitude helps it –  a survivalist Bible for sure.

In a recent article Holly points out the positives of staying put. Here’s my summary of her ideas:

  • Obviously the quickest and easiest safe spot is the place you are already at
  • No additional property costs. No  journeys.
  • You’ll need 6 to 8 adults in the best case scenario to defend an average-sized residence. Most houses have roughly 4 directions to guard.

I dispute the last point. Either via modern technology (infrared door sensors and modern alarm systems), or old school (stringed cans), warning systems can be implemented. Your home will be just one more house to raid, rather than a particular target – they will not expect warning systems.

The idea of many adults is very valid. But if you defeat a gang of intruders, make sure you have a Plan B to retreat to – there will always be a bigger oppressing force that turns up.

To survive In Situ, think Ann Frank:

  • Hide. When the oppressors are searching, efficiency is a factor. Think outside the box – choose somewhere that is too hard to discover. Like under a ton of bricks…
  • Distract. Anything that distracts then from their search is to your advantage. Think rabid dog.
  • Endure. Stay hidden for weeks or months. Prepare for this ahead of time.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.