May 2011 Doomsday Predictions
May 11, 2011: Planetary alignment to cause catastrophic earthquakes. Story is big in Italy. Prediction supposedly made by Raffaele Bendandi (who died in 1979), but has been denied. Science says that the gravitational effects of alignment cannot cause earthquakes, and this is correct.
May 21, 2011: Judgement Day according to Harold Camping of FamilyRadio.
…the group’s billboards have been erected in more than 40 countries, including Turkey, Iraq, Mexico, Zimbabwe, India, Poland and Russia. In Canada, the ads have appeared in 17 cities from Halifax to Vancouver…Caravans of volunteers are also handing out pamphlets, mostly in the United States. A small contingent is scheduled to arrive in Calgary this Friday and Vancouver next Tuesday.
…Mr. Camping has been wrong before. He wrote a book predicting the world would end in 1994. Family Radio now says that “important subsequent biblical information” was not known at the time.
Of course all these stories do is the lessen the power of the 2012 meme. Stay tuned for many more prior to Dec 2012.
Food for thought
8pm. 20th December 2012 = 666
8pm = 2012 2 + 0 + 1 x 2 = 6
20th Dec = 2012 2 + 0 + 1 x 2 = 6
2012 = 2012 2 + 0 + 1 x 2 = 6
Hi Kol,I laughed my ass off about the pagan Bar-B-Q,good show that was hilarious!
Keep up the good work,the world needs more good humor!
I only read this story yesterday; then i turn on the news this morning and immediatly saw images of a ‘big quake’ in Spain (M5.2). What a surprise this was for me!
@Trevor: 2 + 0 + 1 x 2 = 4 (not 6)
There’s one of these billboards near where I live. I’m hosting a Pagan BBQ underneath it on May 22nd!
Hi Trevor,I suppose I can take a purported date for doomsday and make up an
equation that reads you gotta be a nut case,I have to ask how you came upon this equation?
We are living in a post-apocalyptic world !
Is the correlation of our modern calendar with the ancient Maya Calendar off by 260 years !!!!
A number of archaeologists, including my father, the late Stephan F. de Borhegyi, (Dr. Stephan Borhegyi), better known simply as “Borhegyi”, and most notably E. Wyllys Andrews (1960, 1965, 1965c, 1968, 1973), have presented convincing archaeological evidence favoring the correlation developed by Dr. Herbert Spinden Since the two correlations differ by 260 years, the so-called “end date,” according to the Spinden correlation occurred in December, 1752. In other words, if Herbert Spinden was right, and one ascribes to the belief that the world would be destroyed at the ending of the Maya calendar’s Fifth World cycle, we are already living in a post-apocalyptic age!!
The late Lee A. Parsons (1969), Esther Pasztory (1978 a), and Marvin Cohodas (1978 a, 1978 b) have been at the center of the controversy. Their evidence indicated that the Puuc and related styles of Maya architecture began in the seventh century, and peeked in the eighth century, a sequence in Yucatan that further favored the Spinden correlation. In contrast, archaeologists like Gordon Willey (1978) believed that the Puuc style of architecture lasted from A.D. 800 to A.D. 1000, favoring the GMT correlation.
Michael D. Coe, today’s unofficial “Dean of Maya Studies”, has been one of the strongest voices still favoring the Spinden correlation. He writes (1993, p.23) that
over the years numerous correlations have been proposed but only the GMT and the Spinden correlations meet the requirements of both dirt archaeology and specific dates. Coe writes that when, in 1910, Joseph Goodman first came up with the correlation that we now accept as the Goodman, Martinez, Thompson correlation, (GMT), it was generally rejected in favor of the correlation developed by the other great Maya archaeologist, Sylvanus G. Morley, and later espoused by Herbert Spinden. When, in 1926, Juan Martinez Hernandez resurrected the Goodman correlation, Thompson “joined suit” and threw in the full weight of his considerable reputation behind it. Even when most of the new radiocarbon dates seemed to go against him,” Thompson “defended his position until the end of his days.” (Breaking the Maya Code (1992, p. 132).
In a publication which appeared in Archeoastronomy in the Americas, Judith Ann Remington writes that, the Thompson or GMT correlation does not fit the astronomical evidence very well, and that when the Carbon 14 dating process became available, it supported the Spinden correlation. She writes that “the GMT correlation was accepted perfunctorily at a time when the Spinden correlation was being rejected because of Spinden’s “ungentlemanly ways”. (Clarifications: The Correlation Debate: internet source, John Major Jenkins, http://alignment2012.com/fap3.html)
My father, (Dr. Stephan Borhegyi) just happened to be working in Guatemala in 1951 with the Carnegie Institution of Washington, and was asked to go to Tikal to collect samples of Sapodilla wood from dated lintels (beams which span the temple doorways) for radiocarbon testing. The results of these radiocarbon tests in 1951, favored the Spinden correlation. More carbon 14 tests were conducted in 1955, using samples of wood taken from a dated lintel at Tikal with a Long Count date of 9.15.10.0.0. which also favored the Spinden correlation (John Paddock, Ignacio Bernal 1970 p.5). According to these tests (Libby 1955, p.132) the date obtained was A.D. 481 +/- 120 years, with other samples belonging to the same Maya inscription cumming in at A.D. 469 +/- 120 years, and A.D. 433 +/- 170 years. In the Spinden correlation this inscription would correspond to 481, and in the GMT correlation at A.D. 741.
A few years later two other independent carbon 14 tests were performed (W.B. Dinsmoor?) again from dated inscriptions on wooden beams from Tikal (see Satterthwait 1965 p.630, Vol. 3 Handbook of Middle American Indians). These radiocarbon tests place the Maya dates from the inscriptions only 23 years later than the 12-9 correlation proposed by Spinden.
However later tests were performed in 1960, by Elizabeth K. Ralph of the University of Pennsylvania, and those tests using a new technique seemed to favor the GMT correlation in most cases. Due to these and other discrepancies in the testing, radiocarbon dating has not resolved the matter as to which correlation is correct. Lacking such decisive archaeological evidence, the archaeological community–pressed to provide usable dates in the Gregorian calendar, came to a consensus favoring the GMT correlation over the Spinden correlation. A study of the history of the controversy reveals that this consensus, rather than being based on solid scientific evidence, was heavily influenced by the personalities and personal lives of the two archaeologists,Spinden and Thompson.
Carl de Borhegyi
Science Does Say That Alignments Cause Gravitational Pull And Cause Earthquakes. There is most definitely a correlation to alignments and this.
Dr Mensure covered this as well as many others. There is extensive information out there if one was not blinded. No matter what, things will occur in times that were prophesied by seers of old and some of new, as many of us have been receiving visions/dreams and encounters with heavenly beings. I’m included with this as well and just received one that I am about to print up on my blog concerning the pole shift and a grand vision that compelled me to know the truth. Angels present type vision/dreams. Not imagination, but powerful events that a person cannot deny. There are also many prophecies by many elders and woman elders across earth from many tribal nations that also know of these things. Below is just 2 pages to back up correlation of earthquakes to planetary alignments, not to mention the effects when you combine 4 asteroids and 3 comets.. Nice recipe for events ..
http://jewels2012ascend.blogspot.com/2011/04/controversial-site-dr-mensure.html
http://jewels2012ascend.blogspot.com/2011/04/more-on-alignments-in-space-correlating.html
Shanti
Its no doubt a Pre-post-apocalyptic world… Never since the beginning of time has our world been in such a way, nor will it be again… Its time to prepare folks and I’m not saying this from some organized religion made up by the powers that be to control mankind.. However I do believe in Christ and have seen him walk with the Pleiadian’s and other angelics… People can take it or leave it. I think the time now is NOT to convince others, it is to strengthen others who KNOW the truth.. The ones that do not know, are just where they wish to be and they will of course gather again and again in another 3D life, cycle, after cycle till they get it. The time for convincing is done…. As Jeff Goldbloom says on Independence Day “Times Up!” This is not a doom or gloom thing.. It is rather exciting to know that we after all were not lied to by the beings of Light, and these beings do come from many dimensional realms. Millions cant be all wrong with it.
Shanti
2012 ALERT !
Was the anticipated astronomical event which was to end the world at the end of the Mayan calendar, according to the Spinden correlation the return of Halley’s comet ?
Was Halley’s comet the doomsday comet believed to be the fire from the sky that was to destroy our world at the end of days, and if so, was Halley’s comet the so called return of Quetzalcoatl ?
Many historians believe that the Aztec ruler Montezuma II sighting of a comet in 1519 caused him to believe that Cortés was Quetzalcoatl returning as the prophecy states to regain his throne, allowing an army of 400 Conquistadors to overwhelm a vast civilization of several million. Halley’s comet did return in 1533 and according to the Aztec Codex Telleriano-Remensis the planet Venus is represented as a smoking star in A.D. 1533, linking Venus to imagery of comets (Milbrath 1999; p.251).
In other words, if Spinden’s correlation was right, and one ascribes to the belief that the world would be destroyed at the ending of the Maya calendar’s Fifth World cycle, we are already living in a post-apocalyptic age!!
Archaeoastronomer Susan Milbrath writes that Halley’s comet is mentioned in a number of Maya accounts (Milbrath, 1999; p.42) (see Kohler 1989; p. 319), and that “comets like eclipses, represent a disruption of the celestial regularity, for they do not follow a predictable seasonal course; hence they are linked to cataclysm in native cosmologies” (Milbrath; 1999, p.57). Comets in the Aztec chronicles (Aveni 1980:27) were known as stars that smoke called citlalinpopoca, and that comets were believed to be linked with the death of a ruler (Milbrath; 1999, p.251).
For more read BREAKING THE MUSHROOM CODE: at mushroomstone.com