Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »
Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » HAARP

HAARP and 2012

Submitted by on March 4, 2008 – 10:38 pm5 Comments

HAARP is basically the USA’s project for messing with the world’s ionosphere, without the world’s permission… but perhaps it is a secret plan to protect all of us from a 2012 event?

HAARP can also “induce precipitation of energetic particles” in the ionosphere, which “could impact the operation and lifespan of satellites.” While this is mainly about protecting satellites from particles from solar flares or nuclear explosions, the phrasing suggests that it might be able to have a subtle negative impact on satellites as well.

The quote is from a recent WIRED article, discussing the release of an official paper that details the potential uses of HAARP.

Surely, if they can protect satellites from solar flares, they can protect us on the ground as well, to some extent?

More flamboyant connections with 2012 include:

Could secret societies have orchestrated the creation of the highly controversial HAARP project in Alaska as a way to control panic, fight wars, and mitigate the natural disasters that are sure to attend the next flyby in 2012?

5 Comments »

  • ethericplane says:

    Because HAARP can project any combination of EM rays, and project those Rays anywhere, and focus them at any point, to create any type of EM field, is there anything it can’t wreck?

    Surely the public understands that every organism is based on EM fields? And if you upset those EM fields the DNA doesn’t work anymore. Well the physical world including geology and weather are also based on EM fields so everything is threatened by HAARP and people everywhere need to stand up and get control of what is being done with this unfathomable weapon.

    There is no chance they have been simply exploring the Ionosphere for 30 years with -now- 17 HAARP installations. This is a growing problem with hundreds of potential evil uses.

  • Traci Mann says:

    What about the flyby in 2012? Is that still happening? i dont see any evidence online anymore. Is it being squelched?

  • Dani says:

    I´m found this video (in spanish) but so interesting.
    Please difund and see!!

    Anonymous vs. HAARP

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DVAf4RTNIU

  • Hi Etherplane, How do you profess to know these things and if true,
    Where are the other HAARP locations? I lived in Alaska until 1986
    and good friends who currently still reside there do not seem to be
    able to produce any info for me. I truly am interested,please reply
    to ravensteve88@yahoo.com

  • laura says:

    Their is a HAARP in northern California not far from Oregon. I saw the it while camping in the wilderness.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.