Dark Comets »

Another Expert Agrees With Dark Comet Theory

February 21, 2013 – 11:31 am | No Comment

Astronomer David Asher (from Armagh University) has agreed with Bill Napier and Janaki Wickramasinghe (Cardiff University) that “dark comets” are real and dangerous.
The following quotes are from a paper by Napier and Asher published in Astronomy & Geophysics.
http://star.arm.ac.uk/preprints/2009/539.pdf

We know that about one bright comet (of absolute magnitude as bright as 7, comparable to Halley’s Comet) arrives in the visibility zone (perihelion q<5AU, say) each year from the Oort cloud. It seems to be securely established that ~1–2% of these are captured into Halleytype (HT) orbits. The dynamical lifetime of a body in such an orbit can be estimated, from which the expected number of HT comets is perhaps ~3000. The actual number of active HT comets is ~25. This discrepancy of at least two powers of 10 in the expected impact rate from comets as deduced from this theoretical argument on the one hand, and observations on the other, is …

Read the full story »
Bunkers

From DIY to Russian megabunkers

Survivalism

Preparing for when the SHTF

Pole Shift

Crustal displacements and magnetic pole shift – both are scary

Comets

Don’t believe NASA – these are a genuine threat

Earthquakes

More likely during eclipses and perhaps Comet Elenin is a factor?

Home » Gamma Rays

Beware – gam­ma-ray bursts could fry us!

Submitted by on October 26, 2007 – 9:27 amNo Comment

In the new re­search, Doug­las Galante and Jor­ge Er­nes­to Hor­vath of the Uni­ver­si­ty of São Pa­o­lo, Bra­zil, ar­gued that gam­ma-ray bursts could shine their le­thal ef­fects across a whole gal­axy, and dam­age life over great­er dis­tances still. The study is to ap­pear in a forth­com­ing is­sue of the In­ter­na­tion­al Jour­nal of As­tro­bi­ol­o­gy.

The bursts could cause “global en­vi­ron­men­tal changes and bio­spheric dam­age” even at dis­tances five times the Milky Way’s width, they wrote.

Gamma-ray bursts are thought to emerge main­ly from the poles of a col­laps­ing star. This cre­ates two, op­po­site­ly-shin­ing beams of ra­di­a­tion shaped like nar­row cones. Plan­ets not ly­ing in these cones would be com­par­a­tive­ly safe; the chief wor­ry is for those that do.

Galante and Hor­vath iden­ti­fied three as­pects of gam­ma-ray bursts as par­t­i­cu­lar­ly deadly.

The first is a flash of gam­ma rays, the high­est-en­er­gy form of light. The flash can im­pe­r­il even the most ra­di­a­tion-resistant or­gan­isms known, the bac­te­ri­um Deinococ­cus ra­dio­du­rans, the re­search­ers wrote. This mi­crobe can take 3,000 times the ra­di­a­tion that would kill a hu­man: the as­sault shreds its ge­nome to hun­dreds of bits, but the har­dy bug stitches them back to­geth­er.

Galante and Hor­vath cal­cu­lat­ed that for a plan­et with a thin at­mos­phere, the gam­ma flash could kill 90 per­cent of D. ra­dio­du­rans from dis­tances up to three times our gal­ax­y’s width. A thick at­mos­phere would pro­tect the mi­crobes from this, but not nec­es­sar­i­ly from a sec­ond com­po­nent of the beam, ul­t­ra­vio­let ra­di­a­tion. Ul­t­ra­vio­let is a type of light slight­ly low­er in en­er­gy than gam­ma rays, but le­thal, large­ly be­cause it pen­e­trates DNA very eas­i­ly.

D. ra­dio­du­rans, the most ra­di­a­tion-re­sis­tant bac­te­ria known. In this im­age, a clus­ter of four of the cells are repli­cat­ing syn­chro­nous­ly. (Cour­te­sy M.J. Da­ly, US­UHS)
For thick-at­mos­phere plan­ets, a gam­ma-ray burst’s ul­t­ra­vio­let rays would kill 90 per­cent of D. ra­dio­du­rans at dis­tances rang­ing from 13,000 to 62,000 light years, about two-thirds the ga­lac­tic width, the re­search­ers cal­cu­lated.

Life sur­viv­ing that on­slaught would have to con­tend with a third ef­fect, de­ple­tion of the at­mos­phere’s pro­tective ozone lay­er by the burst. This would kill 90 per­cent of D. ra­dio­du­rans at up to 40 per­cent of the dis­tance across the Milky Way, Ga­lante and Hor­vath es­ti­mat­ed.

Gamma-ray bursts are de­tected rough­ly once dai­ly some­where in the sky. The like­li­hood of one strik­ing Earth has been de­bat­ed. Re­search­ers at Ohio State Uni­ver­si­ty cal­cu­lat­ed, in a pape­r in the re­search jour­nal Ac­ta As­tro­no­mi­ca late last year, that the prob­a­bil­i­ty is vir­tu­al­ly nil. Our gal­ax­y’s chem­i­cal com­po­si­tion is in­com­pat­i­ble with strong gam­ma-ray bursts, they wrote.

On the oth­er hand, as­tro­no­mers at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Kan­sas in Law­rence, Kan. and at NASA hy­poth­e­sized in 2004 that at least one has al­ready struck Earth, caus­ing the so-called Or­do­vi­ci­an Mass Ex­tinc­tion 450 mil­lion years ago. The Earth’s sec­ond most dev­as­tat­ing ex­tinc­tion, it de­stroyed an ar­ray of the life forms that had flour­ished un­til then, re­strict­ed in that time to the seas.

Enough said. If the ancient Mayans (or they who gave them the info) could accurately predict a gamma-ray event that would be aimed at our planet, then that event could possibly happen in Dec 2012.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.