{"id":272,"date":"2009-02-13T19:50:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-13T19:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/2009\/02\/lhc-is-still-safe-probably.html"},"modified":"2009-02-13T19:50:00","modified_gmt":"2009-02-13T19:50:00","slug":"lhc-is-still-safe-probably","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/2009\/02\/lhc-is-still-safe-probably-272.html","title":{"rendered":"LHC is still safe &#8211; probably"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The underlying fear of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Large_Hadron_Collider\">Large Hadron Collider<\/a> (LHC) is that it is too experimental for any scientist to truly understand the risks.<\/p>\n<p>Originally we were told that it was impossible for black holes (that could gobble up the entire planet) to be created, because they &#8220;would decay before they got the chance to do any damage&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>This has been <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/0901.2948\">updated<\/a> to:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;the growth of black holes to catastrophic size does not <span style=\"font-style:italic;\"><span style=\"font-weight:bold;\">seem <\/span><\/span>possible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cthe expected decay times are much longer (and possibly \u226b 1 sec) than is typically predicted by other models\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>By &#8220;other models&#8221; this scientist is referring to his own previous study which announced that a black hole could not last longer than one second. I find it disturbing that the language used to describe the safety has changed slightly, has become less iron-clad.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The underlying fear of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is that it is too experimental for any scientist to truly understand the risks.<br \/>\nOriginally we were told that it was impossible for black holes (that could gobble up the entire planet) to be created, because they &#8220;would decay before they got the chance to do any damage&#8221;.<br \/>\nThis has been updated to:<br \/>\n&#8220;the growth of black holes to catastrophic size does not seem possible.\u201d<br \/>\n\u201cthe expected decay times are much longer (and possibly \u226b 1 sec) than is typically predicted by other models\u201d<br \/>\nBy &#8220;other models&#8221; this scientist is referring to his own previous study which announced that a black hole could not last longer than one second. I find it disturbing that the language used to describe the safety has changed slightly, has become less iron-clad.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[107],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-large-hadron-collider"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=272"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/survive2012.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->